During the last presidential debate this year the Hippocratic Oath was mentioned as being sufficient to protect babies who have survived an abortion. The sad fact is that the original oath is rarely used by medical schools today.
When the Hippocratic Oath was written human life had little value, abortion and suicide were common practices. The oath was a social contract between physician and patient. The heart of the oath stated:
I WILL FOLLOW that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous. I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; and in like manner I will not give a woman an instrument to produce abortion.
If your physician had taken this oath you could have confidence that he upheld the sanctity of human life and would try to cure your illness to the best of his abilities; he would not take it upon himself to kill you.
Where are we today in relation to the original oath?
Three years before euthanasia was officially legalized in the Netherlands World magazine ran an article “The Dutch culture of death” on May 23, 1998.
An excerpt:
Furthering the de facto legalization in the guidelines is the loophole for force majeure, or euthanasia “without the explicit request of the patient.” Under that rubric, euthanasia is allowed “if the person concerned was compelled to commit a criminal act by circumstances.” Doctors can be exempted from prosecution in even forcible euthanasia cases where their two duties “conflict”: the choice between the duty to preserve life and the duty to relieve unbearable suffering when there is no prospect of improvement. Herbert Hendin, an American physician who last year authored Seduced by Death: Doctors, Patients, and the Dutch Cure notes that “the Netherlands has moved from assisted suicide to euthanasia; from euthanasia for those who are terminally ill to euthanasia for those who are chronically ill; from euthanasia for physical illness to euthanasia for psychological distress; and from voluntary euthanasia to involuntary euthanasia.”
This excerpt is from Life News on June 23, 2008:
Oregon resident Barbara Wagner found out last month that her lung cancer, in remission for about two years, was back. After her oncologist prescribed a cancer drug that could slow the cancer growth and extend her life, Wagner was notified that the Oregon Health Plan wouldn’t cover it. It would cover comfort and care, including, if she chose, assisted suicide.
Another excerpt from World, “A License to kill” on August 9, 2008:
Randy Stroup is a 53-year-old Oregon man who has prostrate cancer, but no insurance to cover his medical treatment. The state pays for treatment in some cases, but it has denied help to Stroup. State officials have determined that chemotherapy would be too expensive and so they have offered him an alternative: death.
Following are four oaths, the original Hippocratic Oath, a modern Hippocratic Oath, a revised modern Hippocratic Oath, and another modern oath.
The heart of each oath has been bolded and italicized.
Compare what each says.
Think about the implications.
Consider asking your physician which oath he has taken.
|
The Hippocratic Oath WHILE I CONTINUE to keep this Oath unviolated, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and the practice of the art, respected by all men, in all times! But should I trespass and violate this Oath, may the reverse be my lot! |
The Hippocratic Oath (Modern Version)
|
The Hippocratic Oath (Revised Modern Version) by Louis Lasagna, Academic Dean of the School of Medicine at Tufts University, and used in many medical schools today. |
Another Modern Oath
Another version, approved by the American Medical Association, is as follows:
You do solemnly swear, each by whatever he or she holds most sacred: That you will be loyal to the Profession of Medicine and just and generous to its members. That you will lead your lives and practice your art in uprightness and honor.
That into whatsoever house you shall enter, it shall be for the good of the sick to the utmost of your power, your holding yourselves far aloof from wrong, from corruption, from the tempting of others to vice.
That you will exercise your art solely for the cure of your patients, and will give no drug, perform no operation, for a criminal purpose, even if solicited, far less suggest it.
That whatsoever you shall see or hear of the lives of men or women which is not fitting to be spoken, you will keep inviolably secret.
These things do you swear. Let each bow the head in sign of acquiescence. And now, if you will be true to this, your oath, may prosperity and good repute be ever yours; the opposite, if you shall prove yourselves forsworn.
Great post! Thanks for pointing out the problems with trusting doctors and not passing laws to keep human life safe!
I admire the valuable information you offer in your articles.Great post, You make 100% right points in a concise and pertinent fashion, This is a really good read for me, thank you for your time.